Skip to main content

Mark Richards on the Evolution of Software Architecture

For this week’s blog on Software Architecture, I listened to Episode 3 of the “Software Architecture Radio” Podcast, which featured Mark Richards, an independent software architect. He has 32 years in the industry, with more than twenty years as a software architect. 

They mostly talked about the evolution of software architecture. Although some of the things they talked about went a little over my head, I was able to pick up on the majority of what they were talking about. 

He divided up the evolution of architecture into five stages. He talked about evolution happening in vertical and horizontal slices, that is within each layer and one layer affecting those above and around it. The layers were (1) hardware, (2) software, (3) human interaction, (4) social interaction, and (5) the environment, such as the internet of things.

He said one thing in particular, need, drives change the fastest. As an aside, he also said that that’s the best way of teaching something in this field, by establishing why a need exists and then later explaining the concept.

There are three things covered that influence architecture. First, agility, which is the speed and coordination to change. Most companies try to embrace this, but many businesses fail at it. Second, velocity, which is the speed of something in a given direction. Third, modularity, which is when independent parts can be combined in lots of ways. They went over the upsides and downsides to each, and you have to compromise many times at one aspect for another

I thought one of the most interesting parts of the podcast was when he said that if you wanted to see what was coming next in technology, read academic papers from twenty years ago. It takes that long for one level of the level of architecture, hardware, to catch up to another, software. It is only recently that we can implement this technology.

Another interesting thing he said was that one of our biggest inhibiters to evolution is the integration of data and functionality. He foresaw a paradigm shift in how we handled this.

As a parting message, he was asked, “what would one piece of advice you would give to an aspiring software architect,” and his answer surprised me. He said to work on people skills, and that was the “hands down” most important advice he could give. This skill is so key in everything you do, including lead and mentor. I found this incredibly interesting, because I am often reminded about how we never do everything in a bubble, and it is extremely important to be able to “play well with others.”

Comments

williambli92982 said…
You must take part in a contest for top-of-the-line blogs on the web. I will suggest this site! casino blackjack

Popular posts from this blog

Apprenticeship Pattern "Nurture Your Passion"

In this week’s post, I will be discussing the apprenticeship pattern “Nurture Your Passion,” as presented by Adewale Oshineye and Dave Hoover. I chose this chapter because I think I have felt like I’ve been just getting by for a while now. The  problem it identifies as, “You work in an environment that stifles your passion for the craft.” I don’t think that’s quite fair to my school or professors. I think that in any discipline, if someone is only studying for the tests or working on the assigned projects and calling it a day when they have passed them in, they are not truly adopting the apprenticeship mindset. Without a constant push forward, I will stagnate. I may get an “A” on the exam or project, but if I forget the material the next day, there is no point. The pattern suggests finding something that sparks interest and pouring myself into it. I have been wanting to do this for a while, but I have made excuse after excuse of not having enough time. The next sentence in th

OOP Basics

For this week’s blog on software design, I chose to watch a video presented by Dr. Steve Bagley on some fundamentals of object oriented programming (OOP). I’m embarrassed to say that although I am taking several upper-level computer science classes, I am unsure I would be able to give a good definition of what object oriented design was. To be fair though, it has been several years since I have taken CS 101, and it seemed like such a foreign concept at the time. I felt silly learning about something so elementary again, but it made a lot more sense when I’ve had as much exposure to OOP as I have now. For the video, he uses a game of “Pong” as an example of how OOP might use objects to represent the “ball” and “paddles.” From there, he talked some about inheritance and touched on a few more topics, albeit briefly. The main reason why I didn’t understand the benefit of this way of programming is that I didn’t know how else you would do it. I didn’t realize that without declari